*'Coleridge's Melancholy'*
Dr Neil Vickers
One of many distinctively modern things
about the young Coleridge is that he described himself as a depressive,
rather than a melancholic. Among other things, this was, I suspect,
a way of saying that his mental sufferings were a by-product of a more
comprehensive 'lowering' of his bodily vigour. And he was sufficiently
a man of the eighteenth century to want to describe that 'lowering'
in exclusively biological terms. My book /Coleridge and the Doctors
/(2004) leaves him in 1806 trying to persuade himself that the stomach
ailments which made his life so miserable and which he had formerly
attributed to gout and scrofula were in fact psychically caused while
the depressions that had beset him at least from early manhood were
the result of physical weakness. In this lecture, I shall describe the
next phase of his thinking about the sources of mental and physical
pain, paying particular attention to his growing interest in the moral
meaning of melancholy and in experiences on the hinterland between melancholy
and madness. I hope to show how the more complex model of mind-body
integration which he developed during these years underpinned his mature
critical thinking as set down in his literary lectures and in /Biographia
Literaria/ (1817). I shall also demonstrate how it involved him returning
to a much older set of assumptions about the relations between melancholy
and the passions.